• Users Online: 178
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 4-8

Rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis prescribing patterns and outcomes: A tertiary care hospital experience in Saudi Arabia


1 Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 Cardiology Department, Dr. Suliman Fakeeh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3 Cardiovascular Diseases Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Namareq F Aldardeer
Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P.O. Box 40047, Jeddah 21499 MBC J-11
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjcp.sjcp_22_22

Rights and Permissions

Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a leading cause of heart disease in children and young adults in developing countries and is considered a significant cause of cardiovascular diseases. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended as secondary prevention for heart complications caused by recurrent acute rheumatic fever. Objective: Our study aims to describe the prescribing patterns of RHD antibiotic secondary prophylaxis among eligible patients and highlight the frequency of valvular heart disease complications requiring intervention. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study included all patients 5 years old and above diagnosed with rheumatic heart fever and/or RHD and eligible for secondary prevention between January 2009 and December 2018. The primary outcome is the frequency of RHD secondary prophylaxis prescribed for eligible patients. Results: Among 806 patients who were screened, 272 patients were eligible for inclusion. A total of 194 (71.3%) were female, and 146 (53.67%) were older than 40. RHD secondary prophylaxis prescribing adherence was found in only 14 of 272 (5.14%). A total of 185 of 272 (68%) patients had at least one cardiac-related intervention during the follow-up period. Valvular heart disease progression was found in 72 of 185 (38.9%) after a primary intervention. Overall mortality was 30 (11%). Conclusion: Our study found low prescribing adherence to RHD secondary prevention among eligible patients in an area with a high disease prevalence. A larger sample size is needed to confirm these findings.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed254    
    Printed64    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded50    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal